Comparing NPS users in nightlife settings and online communities

Susana Henriques, Joana Paula Silva, Marie Claire Van Hout, Evelyn Hearne, Annemieke Benschop, Dirk Korf, Michal Bujalski, Łukasz Wieczorek, Bernd Werse, Katalin Felvinczi, Katarzyna Dąbrowska, Zsuzsa Kaló, Gerrit Kamphausen, Ton Nabben

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article reports on the comparison between two groups of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) users: users in nightlife settings and users in online communities. A quantitative survey was conducted in six EU countries (Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, and Portugal) within a convenience sample of adult (18 years+) current (12-month) NPS users. Participants self-completed either a pen-and-paper or online questionnaire. 2,757 respondents across the six European countries were reached during data collection in the two considered user groups. The comparison was based on sociodemographic characteristics, use patterns and market. The groups of NPS used are: herbal blends and/or synthetic cannabinoids; branded stimulants and/or stimulants/empathogenics/nootropics obtained pure; psychedelics; dissociatives; and other NPS. Internet and virtual markets assume great relevance both for nightlife and online communities. Different drug policies and diverse geographical location between the participant countries are the main characteristics that impact on the results - namely in the presence/absence of some substances, or in the legal concept of NPS. Comparing users in nightlife settings and online users highlighted substantive trends in NPS use across countries and user groups. New opportunities in the drug market were driven by technological developments on the internet.</span></p>
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-57
Number of pages13
JournalVideo Journal of Social and Human Research
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing NPS users in nightlife settings and online communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this