Determining the value of a digital archive: the framework for the “archive–as–is”

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

    38 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Archives are, more than ever, organizational and technological constructs, based on organizational demands, desires, and considerations influencing configuration, management, appraisal, and preservation. For that reason, they are, more than ever, distortions of reality, offering biased (and/or manipulated) images of the past and present an extremely simplified mirror of social reality. The information objects within that archive are (again: more than ever), fragile, manipulable, of disputable provenance, doubtful context, and uncertain quality. Their authenticity is in jeopardy.
    The “Allure of Digital Archives” will be more about finding knowledge about the archive as a whole than about finding knowledge hidden in the information objects that are its constituents. It will be about determining the value of a digital archive as a “trusted” resource for historical research. To be successful in that endeavour, it will be necessary to assess the possibility to “reconstruct the past” of the digital archive. That assessment would allow historians to understand quality, provenance, context, content, and accessibility of the digital archive, not only in its design stage but also in its life cycle.
    In this chapter, I present the theoretical framework of the “Archive–as–Is” as an instrument for such an assessment. It is possible for historians to use this framework as a declarative model for the way archives have been designed, configured, managed, and maintained. It will allow historians to understand why archives are as they are, and why records are part of it (or not). Using the framework, historians can determine the research value of a digital archive as a historical resource.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationFrom dust to dawn
    Subtitle of host publicationarchival studies after the archival turn
    EditorsAnn Öhrberg, Tim Berndtsson, Otto Fischer, Annie Mattson
    Place of PublicationUppsala
    PublisherUniversity of Uppsala
    Chapter2
    Pages56-101
    Edition1
    ISBN (Print)9789198008159
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2022

    Publication series

    NameStudia Rhetorica Upsaliensia/Uppsala Rhetorical Studies
    PublisherUniversity of Uppsala
    Volume8
    ISSN (Print)1102-9714

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Determining the value of a digital archive: the framework for the “archive–as–is”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this