TY - JOUR
T1 - Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on the Use of a Wearable Device for Early Detection and Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring of Acute Respiratory Infections in Nursing Homes
T2 - Qualitative Study
AU - Grootegoed, Laura C
AU - Pol, Margriet C
AU - Hertogh, Cees Mpm
AU - Kolodziej, Lisa M
AU - de Jong, Menno D
AU - Schinkel, Janke
AU - van Buul, Laura W
N1 - © Laura Cornelle Grootegoed, Margriet C Pol, Cees MPM Hertogh, Lisa M Kolodziej, Menno D de Jong, Janke Schinkel, Laura W van Buul. Originally published in JMIR Nursing (https://nursing.jmir.org).
PY - 2026/5/25
Y1 - 2026/5/25
N2 - BACKGROUND: The growing aging population and staff shortages are placing pressure on Dutch nursing homes (NHs). These challenges have led to an increased interest in digital health technologies. Among these are wearable devices that allow for remote continuous monitoring of vital signs. An example is the Healthdot (smartQare), a wearable electronic device that continuously monitors heart rate, respiratory rate, and physical activity. In the context of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in NHs, where initial symptoms can go unnoticed, continuous monitoring may aid in early recognition, timely intervention, and reduce staff workloads. However, little is known about how health care professionals perceive the use of continuous vital signs monitoring devices, such as the Healthdot, for this cause in NHs.OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the use of the Healthdot for early detection and monitoring of ARIs in NHs, to inform potential future implementation.METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 physicians, nurses, and certified nursing assistants from 4 NHs and 1 acute geriatric community hospital located in a NH. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed to identify themes regarding their perspectives on the use of the Healthdot for monitoring ARIs in this setting.RESULTS: Five main themes were identified that related to the appropriate use of the Healthdot for NH clients and health care professionals: alignment of Healthdot use and NH clients' treatment policies, balancing safety and freedom, impact of the Healthdot on work processes, supporting rather than replacing care, and possible use during pandemics and in the future. Additionally, several preconditions for the use of the Healthdot were identified, including its usability, a support base among care staff, adequate training and guidance, communication with NH clients and their relatives, and a clear policy regarding its use.CONCLUSIONS: Given the complexity of care in NHs, where clinical care is typically balanced against quality of life and a homelike environment, physicians generally expressed reserved attitudes toward the Healthdot, highlighting the need to consider multiple factors in its implementation. Care staff were generally positive about the device. Nevertheless, tailored assessment for each individual NH client remains essential, balancing treatment goals, safety, autonomy, and person-centered care. Additionally, clear communication and alignment between health care professionals in this setting are crucial, specifically regarding their expectations of the Healthdot's role in care processes. This study offers practical guidance that may inform future implementation efforts of continuous vital sign monitoring devices in NHs.
AB - BACKGROUND: The growing aging population and staff shortages are placing pressure on Dutch nursing homes (NHs). These challenges have led to an increased interest in digital health technologies. Among these are wearable devices that allow for remote continuous monitoring of vital signs. An example is the Healthdot (smartQare), a wearable electronic device that continuously monitors heart rate, respiratory rate, and physical activity. In the context of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in NHs, where initial symptoms can go unnoticed, continuous monitoring may aid in early recognition, timely intervention, and reduce staff workloads. However, little is known about how health care professionals perceive the use of continuous vital signs monitoring devices, such as the Healthdot, for this cause in NHs.OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the use of the Healthdot for early detection and monitoring of ARIs in NHs, to inform potential future implementation.METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 physicians, nurses, and certified nursing assistants from 4 NHs and 1 acute geriatric community hospital located in a NH. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed to identify themes regarding their perspectives on the use of the Healthdot for monitoring ARIs in this setting.RESULTS: Five main themes were identified that related to the appropriate use of the Healthdot for NH clients and health care professionals: alignment of Healthdot use and NH clients' treatment policies, balancing safety and freedom, impact of the Healthdot on work processes, supporting rather than replacing care, and possible use during pandemics and in the future. Additionally, several preconditions for the use of the Healthdot were identified, including its usability, a support base among care staff, adequate training and guidance, communication with NH clients and their relatives, and a clear policy regarding its use.CONCLUSIONS: Given the complexity of care in NHs, where clinical care is typically balanced against quality of life and a homelike environment, physicians generally expressed reserved attitudes toward the Healthdot, highlighting the need to consider multiple factors in its implementation. Care staff were generally positive about the device. Nevertheless, tailored assessment for each individual NH client remains essential, balancing treatment goals, safety, autonomy, and person-centered care. Additionally, clear communication and alignment between health care professionals in this setting are crucial, specifically regarding their expectations of the Healthdot's role in care processes. This study offers practical guidance that may inform future implementation efforts of continuous vital sign monitoring devices in NHs.
KW - Humans
KW - Nursing Homes/organization & administration
KW - Wearable Electronic Devices/statistics & numerical data
KW - Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis
KW - Qualitative Research
KW - Female
KW - Vital Signs
KW - Male
KW - Health Personnel/psychology
KW - Early Diagnosis
KW - Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation
KW - Attitude of Health Personnel
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Netherlands
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
U2 - 10.2196/84436
DO - 10.2196/84436
M3 - Article
C2 - 42184338
SN - 2562-7600
VL - 9
SP - e84436
JO - JMIR nursing
JF - JMIR nursing
ER -