Maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing in laryngectomised patients using different heat and moisture exchangers - Feasibility and exercise responses

Anne N. Heirman, Wim G. Groen, Lisette Van Der Molen, Richard Dirven, Michiel W.M. Van Den Brekel, Martijn M. Stuiver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective. After laryngectomy, the breathing resistance of heat and moisture exchangers may limit exercise capacity. Breathing gas analysis during cardiopulmonary exercise testing is not possible using regular masks. This study tested the feasibility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing with a heat and moisture exchanger in situ, using an in-house designed connector. Additionally, we explored the effect of different heat and moisture exchanger resistances on exercise capacity in this group. 

Methods. Ten participants underwent two cardiopulmonary exercise tests using their daily life heat and moisture exchanger (0.3 hPa or 0.6 hPa) and one specifically developed for activity (0.15 hPa). Heat and moisture exchanger order was randomised and blinded.

Results. All participants completed both tests. No (serious) adverse events occurred. Only four subjects reached a respiratory exchange ratio of more than 1.1 in at least one test. Maximum exercise levels using heat and moisture exchangers with different resistances did not differ. 

Conclusion. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in laryngectomees with a heat and moisture exchanger is feasible; however, the protocol does not seem appropriate to reach this group's maximal exercise capacity. Lowering heat and moisture exchanger resistance does not increase exercise capacity in this sample.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-223
JournalJournal of Laryngology and Otology
Volume138
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing in laryngectomised patients using different heat and moisture exchangers - Feasibility and exercise responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this