Measuring the Concurrent Validity of the Athletic Skills Track Using Expert Judgment

Johanna E.A. Brocken, John van der Kamp, Rene Wormhoudt, Matthieu L. Lenoir, Geert J.P. Savelsbergh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to measure the concurrent validity of the Athletic Skills Track (AST) by examining whether its outcome score correlates with the holistic judgments of experts about the quality of movement. Method: Video recordings of children performing the AST were shown to physical education teachers who independently gave a holistic rating of the movement quality of each child. Results: Both intra- and interrater reliability of the teachers’ ratings were moderate to good. The holistic judgments on movement quality were significantly correlated with AST time, showing that higher ratings were associated with less time required to complete the track. Next, hierarchical stepwise regression indicated that in addition to the holistic rating, also age, but not gender, explained part of the variance in AST time. Conclusion: The findings show that the AST has good concurrent validity and provides a fast, indirect indication for quality of movement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-242
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Teaching in Physical Education
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring the Concurrent Validity of the Athletic Skills Track Using Expert Judgment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this