Predicting long-term neurocognitive outcome after pediatric intensive care unit admission for bronchiolitis-preliminary exploration of the potential of machine learning

Eleonore S V de Sonnaville, Jacob Vermeule, Kjeld Oostra, Hennie Knoester, Job B M van Woensel, Somaya Ben Allouch, Jaap Oosterlaan, Marsh Kӧnigs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: For successful prevention and intervention, it is important to unravel the complex constellation of factors that affect neurocognitive functioning after pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission. This study aims (1) to elucidate the potential relevance of patient and PICU-related characteristics for long-term adverse neurocognitive outcome after PICU admission for bronchiolitis, and (2) to perform a preliminary exploration of the potential of machine learning as compared to linear regression to improve neurocognitive outcome prediction in a relatively small sample of children after PICU admission. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study investigated 65 children aged 6–12 years with previous PICU admission for bronchiolitis (age ≤ 1 year). They were compared to demographically comparable healthy peers (n = 76) on neurocognitive functioning. Patient and PICU-related characteristics used for the prediction models were as follows: demographic characteristics, perinatal and disease parameters, laboratory results, and intervention characteristics, including hourly validated mechanical ventilation parameters. Neurocognitive outcome was measured by intelligence and computerized neurocognitive testing. Prediction models were developed for each of the neurocognitive outcomes using Regression Trees, k-Nearest Neighbors, and conventional linear regression analysis. Results: The patient group had lower intelligence than the control group (p <.001, d = −0.59) and poorer performance in neurocognitive functions, i.e., speed and attention (p =.03, d = −0.41) and verbal memory (p <.001, d = −0.60). Lower intelligence was predicted by lower birth weight and lower socioeconomic status (R 2 = 25.9%). Poorer performance on the speed and attention domain was predicted by younger age at follow-up (R 2 = 53.5%). Poorer verbal memory was predicted by lower birth weight, younger age at follow-up, and greater exposure to acidotic events (R 2 = 50.6%). The machine learning models did not reveal added value in terms of model performance as compared to linear regression. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that in children with previous PICU admission for bronchiolitis, (1) lower birth weight, younger age at follow-up, and lower socioeconomic status are associated with poorer neurocognitive outcome; and (2) greater exposure to acidotic events during PICU admission is associated with poorer verbal memory outcome. The findings of this study provide no evidence for the added value of machine learning models as compared to linear regression analysis in the prediction of long-term neurocognitive outcome in a relatively small sample of children. (Table presented.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-482
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Pediatrics
Volume183
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Funding

This study was supported by grants of the Janivo, C.J. Vaillant and Louise Vehmeijer charity foundations.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting long-term neurocognitive outcome after pediatric intensive care unit admission for bronchiolitis-preliminary exploration of the potential of machine learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this