TY - JOUR
T1 - Review article: Natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale
AU - Ward, Philip J.
AU - Blauhut, Veit
AU - Bloemendaal, Nadia
AU - Daniell, James E.
AU - de Ruiter, Marleen C.
AU - Duncan, Melanie J.
AU - Emberson, Robert
AU - Jenkins, Susanna F.
AU - Kirschbaum, Dalia
AU - Kunz, Michael
AU - Mohr, Susanna
AU - Muis, Sanne
AU - Riddell, Graeme A.
AU - Schäfer, Andreas
AU - Stanley, Thomas
AU - Veldkamp, Ted I. E.
AU - Winsemius, Hessel C.
PY - 2020/4/22
Y1 - 2020/4/22
N2 - Since 1990, natural hazards have led to over 1.6 million fatalities globally, and economic losses are estimated at an average of around USD 260–310 billion per year. The scientific and policy communities recognise the need to reduce these risks. As a result, the last decade has seen a rapid development of global models for assessing risk from natural hazards at the global scale. In this paper, we review the scientific literature on natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale, and we specifically examine whether and how they have examined future projections of hazard, exposure, and/or vulnerability. In doing so, we examine similarities and differences between the approaches taken across the different hazards, and we identify potential ways in which different hazard communities can learn from each other. For example, there are a number of global risk studies focusing on hydrological, climatological, and meteorological hazards that have included future projections and disaster risk reduction measures (in the case of floods), whereas fewer exist in the peer-reviewed literature for global studies related to geological hazards. On the other hand, studies of earthquake and tsunami risk are now using stochastic modelling approaches to allow for a fully probabilistic assessment of risk, which could benefit the modelling of risk from other hazards. Finally, we discuss opportunities for learning from methods and approaches being developed and applied to assess natural hazard risks at more continental or regional scales. Through this paper, we hope to encourage further dialogue on knowledge sharing between disciplines and communities working on different hazards and risk and at different spatial scales.
AB - Since 1990, natural hazards have led to over 1.6 million fatalities globally, and economic losses are estimated at an average of around USD 260–310 billion per year. The scientific and policy communities recognise the need to reduce these risks. As a result, the last decade has seen a rapid development of global models for assessing risk from natural hazards at the global scale. In this paper, we review the scientific literature on natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale, and we specifically examine whether and how they have examined future projections of hazard, exposure, and/or vulnerability. In doing so, we examine similarities and differences between the approaches taken across the different hazards, and we identify potential ways in which different hazard communities can learn from each other. For example, there are a number of global risk studies focusing on hydrological, climatological, and meteorological hazards that have included future projections and disaster risk reduction measures (in the case of floods), whereas fewer exist in the peer-reviewed literature for global studies related to geological hazards. On the other hand, studies of earthquake and tsunami risk are now using stochastic modelling approaches to allow for a fully probabilistic assessment of risk, which could benefit the modelling of risk from other hazards. Finally, we discuss opportunities for learning from methods and approaches being developed and applied to assess natural hazard risks at more continental or regional scales. Through this paper, we hope to encourage further dialogue on knowledge sharing between disciplines and communities working on different hazards and risk and at different spatial scales.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084228767&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1069-2020
DO - https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1069-2020
M3 - Review article
SN - 1684-9981
VL - 20
SP - 1069
EP - 1096
JO - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
JF - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
IS - 4
ER -