The Forensic Confirmation Bias: A Comparison Between Experts and Novices

Claire A.J. van den Eeden, Christianne J. de Poot, Peter J. van Koppen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)


A large body of research has described the influence of context information on forensic decision-making. In this study, we examined the effect of context information on the search for and selection of traces by students (N = 36) and crime scene investigators (N = 58). Participants investigated an ambiguous mock crime scene and received prior information indicating suicide, a violent death or no information. Participants described their impression of the scene and wrote down which traces they wanted to secure. Results showed that con- text information impacted first impression of the scene and crime scene behavior, namely number of traces secured. Participants in the murder condition secured most traces. Furthermore, the students secured more crime-related traces. Students were more confident in their first impres- sion. This study does not indicate that experts outperform novices. We therefore argue for proper training on cognitive processes as an integral part of all forensic education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-126
JournalJournal of Forensic Sciences
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'The Forensic Confirmation Bias: A Comparison Between Experts and Novices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this