TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of predictive equations for resting energy expenditure in obese adolescents
AU - H. Hofsteenge, Geesje
AU - Chinapaw, Mai J.M.
AU - A. Delemarre-van de Waal, Henriette
AU - Weijs, Peter JM
PY - 2010/5
Y1 - 2010/5
N2 - Background: When the resting energy expenditure (REE) of overweight
and obese adolescents cannot be measured by indirect calorimetry,
it has to be predicted with an equation.
Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the validity of
published equations for REE compared with indirect calorimetry in
overweight and obese adolescents.
Design: Predictive equations based on weight, height, sex, age, fatfree mass (FFM), and fat mass were compared with measured REE.
REE was measured by indirect calorimetry, and body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The accuracy of the REE equations was evaluated on the basis of the percentage of adolescents predicted within 10% of REE measured, the mean percentage difference between predicted and measured values (bias), and the root mean squared prediction error (RMSE).
Results: Forty-three predictive equations (of which 12 were based on FFM) were included. Validation was based on 70 girls and 51 boys with a mean age of 14.5 y and a mean (6SD) body mass index SD score of 2.93 6 0.45. The percentage of adolescents with accurate predictions ranged from 74% to 12% depending on the equation used. The most accurate and precise equation for these adolescents was the Molnar equation (accurate predictions: 74%; bias: –1.2%; RMSE: 174 kcal/d). The often-used Schofield-weight equation for age 10–18 y was not accurate (accurate predictions: 50%; bias: +10.7%; RMSE: 276 kcal/d).
Conclusions: Indirect calorimetry remains the method of choice for
REE in overweight and obese adolescents. However, the sex-specific
Molnar REE prediction equation appears to be the most accurate for
overweight and obese adolescents aged 12–18 y. This trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl with the Netherlands Trial Register as ISRCTN27626398.
AB - Background: When the resting energy expenditure (REE) of overweight
and obese adolescents cannot be measured by indirect calorimetry,
it has to be predicted with an equation.
Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the validity of
published equations for REE compared with indirect calorimetry in
overweight and obese adolescents.
Design: Predictive equations based on weight, height, sex, age, fatfree mass (FFM), and fat mass were compared with measured REE.
REE was measured by indirect calorimetry, and body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The accuracy of the REE equations was evaluated on the basis of the percentage of adolescents predicted within 10% of REE measured, the mean percentage difference between predicted and measured values (bias), and the root mean squared prediction error (RMSE).
Results: Forty-three predictive equations (of which 12 were based on FFM) were included. Validation was based on 70 girls and 51 boys with a mean age of 14.5 y and a mean (6SD) body mass index SD score of 2.93 6 0.45. The percentage of adolescents with accurate predictions ranged from 74% to 12% depending on the equation used. The most accurate and precise equation for these adolescents was the Molnar equation (accurate predictions: 74%; bias: –1.2%; RMSE: 174 kcal/d). The often-used Schofield-weight equation for age 10–18 y was not accurate (accurate predictions: 50%; bias: +10.7%; RMSE: 276 kcal/d).
Conclusions: Indirect calorimetry remains the method of choice for
REE in overweight and obese adolescents. However, the sex-specific
Molnar REE prediction equation appears to be the most accurate for
overweight and obese adolescents aged 12–18 y. This trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl with the Netherlands Trial Register as ISRCTN27626398.
KW - Obesity
KW - Adolescents
KW - Energy expenditure
KW - Predicting
U2 - 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28330
DO - 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28330
M3 - Article
SN - 1938-3207
VL - 91
SP - 1244
EP - 1254
JO - The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
JF - The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
IS - 5
ER -